aFlickringLight weblog

Just another DavyJones production

Archive for November 2008

The Auto Industry – Served

leave a comment »

Facing increasing pressure from Congress and the American people, the auto industry is having to start cleaning up its act. It has been given a December deadline to regroup and approach Congress with a detailed plan, one that outlines drastic restructuring and operating measures and one that offers some definitive answers to lawmakers how money from a potential bailout package will be spent.

Below is a poll from OrangeCountyGasPrices.com on consumer reaction locally to the possible government bailout of the American Auto Industry.

And here is a recent commercial from Ford, advertising Employee Pricing programs for customers. The video has a clear message – help us.

“These are the keys to what America needs right now.”

Written by hockeymandave

November 26, 2008 at 5:34 pm

Relief at the Pumps

leave a comment »

Some months ago, two reporters for MarketWatch reported on the way in which oil and gasoline was traded on the open market. Upon investigation, four energy analysts reported back in June of this year to the House Energy and Commerce Committee that the price of retail gasoline could fall by half, to around $2 a gallon, within 30 days of the passage of a law that would limit speculation in energy-futures markets.

Fadel Gheit of Oppenheimer & Co. testified that –

“Record oil prices are inflated by speculation and not justified by market fundamentals. Based on supply and demand fundamentals, crude-oil prices should not be above $60 per barrel.”

Something that oil industry insiders don’t want you to know, something that allows them to make billions in profit at the expense of the consumer and the world economy. Because of record oil prices at the pumps this past summer that drove the cost of gasoline in the United States to over $4.50 a gallon in some areas, and over $4 a gallon on the national average, demand for energy and oil has severely dropped off. The economy has changed drastically since this past summer as well, leading to less travel and less spending.

And what do I see at the pumps this week? I just paid $1.84 for a gallon of gas in Tustin, California. And the national average is back under $2 a gallon. What has changed? Gas prices for the past few months have slowly been on the decline, but in the past two weeks have seen night-to-day decreases over over 20-30 cents at stations locally and across the country. Finally, we are seeing some relief at the pumps.

But what is really beginning to scare oil producers such as the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is the lack of a significant increase in demand with prices reaching five year lows. OPEC is wanting to cut oil production by 1.5 million barrels of oil per day to try and bring the cost of oil back up. But the latest weekly U.S. Department of Energy report on energy stockpiles showed a significant drop in fuel demand across the Untied States. Even emerging nations such as China and India are seeing cooling effects with regards to energy demand.

The oil companies have been caught red handed. They have been caught inflating the price of oil through speculative trading. The weakening economy was the catalyst that forced the major oil companies to finally drop the cost of oil at the pumps to realistic levels.

Photo Credit: The Gas Station and Facebook

Written by hockeymandave

November 25, 2008 at 5:29 pm

Posted in Blogroll, Uncategorized

Tagged with , ,

The Cabinet in a Nutshell

with one comment

News continues to trickle out of the Obama Transition Team’s office in Illinois regarding officially and unofficially announced Cabinet positions for the Obama administration. Let’s take a look at a breakdown –

It is widely expected that President-Elect Barack Obama will formally ask Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) to accept the role of Secretary of State. Clinton, Obama’s chief rival during the Democratic Primaries for Democratic presidential nomination, brings a lot to the table for the position. Her world-class status as a renowned diplomat and various relations with world leaders will prove important and worthy of the nomination. She has garnered significant influence in the United States Senate despite her relatively short tenure, elected in 2000 and re-elected in 2006. All of this will prove significant to the position. But the rumors surrounding Obama’s nomination of Clinton proves more important than just filling a cabinet seat – it is evidence that President-Elect Obama is trying to begin an era of a new kind of politics, an era not bogged down by partisanship and enemies. Surely in politics, there will be those who disagree with you, politicians from both sides of the political spectrum.

President Abraham Lincoln crowned the tone of argument amongst cabinet members. He welcomed and encouraged arguments amongst his Cabinet, using disagreements as a point-counterpoint measure to gauge effectiveness of policy decisions before taking public action. Historian and author Doris Kearns Goodwin argues that Lincoln’s motis operandi of surrounding himself with dissenting opinions to mold public policy consensus is what’s missing from today’s Cabinet and is what this country needs.

And it appears that is what President-Elect Obama is trying to accomplish. Wanting to bring aboard rivals and opponents as well as supporters to the Cabinet will offer a unique perspective into policy making and will shape public policy for the better, especially in such times of economic crisis today.

This is exactly the thinking taking place in Obama’s Secretary of Defense pick. Probable candidate is the current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who was sworn in as the defense secretary in December, 2006, and Obama is expected to ask Gates to stay on as the Pentagon Chief for at least one more year. His resumé includes 27 years of service with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) as both an agent and director. His experience in recent years with national security and defense measures as well as ongoing counter-terrorism measures likely tops Obama’s reasoning for his continued service.

New York Federal Reserve Bank President Timothy Geithner has officially been chosen by President-Elect Obama as the next Secretary of Treasury. Geithner helped manage Wall Street’s financial crisis earlier in the year, overseeing the acquisition of Bear Stearns by the more financially secure JPMorgan Chase, as well as the bailouts of AIG and Lehman Brothers. His experience in working with the United States Treasury Department date back to the late 1980’s, where he held various secretarial positions even beyond the Clinton administration of 1992-2000. He will be heading up the Obama economic advisory committee as the face that sells its ideas to Congress and to the people. He is widely respected amongst his peers and in and around Washington, and should provide the know-how to save this country from the economic crisis it is in today. He will lead an economic team consisting of Lawrence H. Summers, Director of the National Economic Council, Christina D. Romer, Director of the Council of Economic Advisors, Melody C. Barnes, Director of the Domestic Policy Council, and Heather A. Higginbottom, Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council.

Below, Barack Obama announces his economic team from his Transition Team headquarters in Chicago, Illinois –

The President-Elect is looking to nominate Retired General James L. Jones as the next National Security Advisor. Jones, who served in Vietnam, was named by former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld as the commander of the U.S. European Command and supreme allied commander of Europe in early 2003.

Democratic Senator Jeff Bingaman looks to be the next Energy Secretary. Bingham currently chairs the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, a committee that oversees U.S. energy policy, a seemingly easy and logical transition for the Senator.

Meanwhile, on the Homeland Security front, Governor Janet Napolitano (D-AZ) is emerging as Obama’s top choice for Secretary of Homeland Security.

Already announced is Robert Gibbs as the Press Secretary. Gibbs, a trusted advisor dating back to Obama’s senatorial bid in 2004, was a senior advisor and communications director for the President-Elect’s presidential campaign.

And lastly for today, the Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel (D-IL). A veteran of the Clinton administration, is well known around Washington. Currently the fourth highest ranking member of the United States House of Representatives, Emanuel has been a trusted advisor for Obama throughout his campaign and Senatorial work, and is a appropriate fit for the next administration. I will end this post with a video from 2005, which C-SPAN just re-aired after learning of Emanuel’s appointment to Chief of Staff.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia

Written by hockeymandave

November 24, 2008 at 5:14 pm

GM Stock Now a Joke

leave a comment »

Will there be a Sequel for General Motors Corporation (GM)? Its stock dipped to dangerously low levels today, trading under $3 for a short period before closing at $3.06 for the day. Investors are concerned over the looming possibility of bankruptcy as GM’s cash balance nears below the needed amount to operate month-to-month.

Updated 11/26/08 – with stock chart YTD:

General Motors Corporation’s (GM) stock has seen dropped significantly Year-To-Date (YTD), trading as of press time between $4 and $5 a share, closing at $4.81.

Original Blog Continued –

The cash-strapped company is seeking economic relief from the federal government in the form of an auto-industry bailout package that would assist competitors Ford and Chrysler as well. But with any assistance being put on the back-burner for the time being, GM is having to resort to holding dealership payments, rebates, and sales-incentive packages for a two-week period, delaying dealer payments until December 11th, two weeks further than the November 28th payout date.

GM is not saying how much these delays will save the company, but it proves to be significant enough to solve, at least temporarily, severe cash-flow problems. The three major auto companies hopefully are spending these next couple of weeks reorganizing the company, coming up with the required business plans demanded of Congress before the Big Three meet again for economic aid. These companies can not continue to operate in the same way they have been, it is partly to blame for their respective economic blunders.

After the Congressional hearings held a week ago, and amid stark criticism, GM has put up two of its private jets from a line of several others for sale, in an effort to regain public trust and sympathy as well as to regain capital, in a monetary form. It has laid off over half of its air travel staff and continues looking for other ways to save money. The luxuries that the Big Three executives afford can simply not continue. They are burning away millions in corporate and executive bonuses and benefits, spending far too much on private jets, and not producing greener vehicles that consumers are demanding. The time for change has come and something must be done. Whether or not the auto industry receives any form of economic aid will largely depend on management – are they willing to ditch the operating procedures and corporate fluff that has, in part, brought the demise of the American auto industry? We will find out soon enough.

ReutersVideo reports:

Photo Credit: CarType

Written by hockeymandave

November 21, 2008 at 5:07 pm

The Future of the GOP

leave a comment »

Much talk has been generated after the results of the 2008 Presidential election as to the fate of the GOP after it suffered a fatal blow. Losing the White House by a wide margin, the Republicans are also in danger of a fillibuster-free Senate as Democrats inch closer to a majority presence.

This election proved many things. This country was tired of the current administration and the past eight years of missteps and wrongdoings. This country, and for that matter, the world, is becoming increasingly interconnected via the world wide web, and the social interaction of the Web 2.0 culture has a huge impact. President-Elect Barack Obama realized this from the beginning, embracing technology as he has done even in his Senate days. The Republican Party on a whole steered shy of utilizing technology though – their largest falter in this election.

And unfortunately for them, the GOP is only now realizing this. A website has sprung up recently calling for change – the same slogan that Barack Obama used to win the White House – a change in their standard operating procedures, and a change in their interactions with others. Rebuild the Party outlines a 10-point action plan to modernize and strengthen the Republican Party from the grassroots up. The site calls for a grassroots first policy, encouraging new candidates, with new strategies, and the embracing of new technologies. A snippet below explains the organizer’s mission statement and touches on what they believe the problems of the party to be.

The time is now to set in motion the changes needed to rebuild our party from the grassroots up, modernize the way we run campaigns, and attract different, energetic, and younger candidates at all levels.

We must be conservative in philosophy — but bold in our approach. We don’t need a slight tweak here or there. We need transformation. We can’t keep fighting a 21st century war with 20th century weapons.

The site calls for the use of the Internet, calling it the party’s number one priority. Organizers have an internal goal of trying to recruit five million new Republican online activists – which will engage grassroots participants and help to create the most creative, engaging, and compelling political messages. The site points out a political ideology that the Obama team has used – the Politics of Us – as his greatest strength. If the GOP can adopt this policy of putting the people first, giving the power to accomplish things to the people, the Republican Party will survive. And that shouldn’t be too hard, given that Obama’s winning strategy is an inherently conservative idea – the people, acting together outside of the government, can accomplish great things. The Yes We Can concept in action.

But who will be the one that can successfully put a face to the party? It is widely thought that Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK) has such ambitions, wanting to put her rock star diva together in 2012 to run for office and resurrect a Republican president. But this is also widely thought to be a laughing matter, and a further detriment to the Republican Party. The GOP does not want Palin. So who do they want? Former Massachusetts Governor Mit Romney seems a likely candidate. He brings with him the independent wealth that he used to jump start and finance his Republican nomination bid over a year ago, and the swagger and following of many within the party. But he will have some hurdles to overcome if he were to succeed in 2012 as the Republican front runner. Romney needs a clear message, one that he believes in and not on that is generated to please potential voters.

Whoever the Republicans pick to be their front runner for office in a couple years, they now know that change is needed. The candidate that can successfully merge technology with policy and speech and can invigorate a grassroots system similar to the millions that President-Elect Obama had mobilized during his campaign will emerge with the party nomination.

CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 reports on the recent Republican Governor’s Association conference in Florida and includes commentary on what Republican Governor’s view as the needs and directions the party must take to succeed in the future.

Photo Credit: No RNC Poster Project, CNN, and Rebuild the Party

Written by hockeymandave

November 21, 2008 at 4:53 pm

Prop 8 Will See It’s Day In Court

leave a comment »

Making the news rounds today is a brief coming out of San Francisco, California, where the Supreme Court of California announced they will hear the case of those against Proposition 8 and its prohibition of same-sex marriages. The court did state that, in accordance with the passage of the proposition, until any decision is made in the opposition of Prop 8, the issuance of same-sex marriage licenses will be suspended.

This echoes the Governors words for opponents of the proposition to fight on. What this proposition has done is take away a civil right, signaling a huge setback to the advancements that had been made earlier in the year by a 4-3 vote of the California Supreme Court.

If past history carries any prevalence, we must not trust these civil rights issues in the hands of voters. Proposition 8 is just a present-day example. Think about if we had put the issue of slavery to a vote a couple hundred years ago. As the majority of wealthy, voting Americans owned and used slaves for labor and services, a vote to abolish slavery would have had trouble even making it on a ballot, let alone passing.

As Apple Inc. said in a public statement regarding Proposition 8:

Apple is publicly opposing Proposition 8 and making a donation of $100,000 to the No on 8 campaign. Apple was among the first California companies to offer equal rights and benefits to our employees’ same-sex partners, and we strongly believe that a person’s fundamental rights — including the right to marry — should not be affected by their sexual orientation. Apple views this as a civil rights issue, rather than just a political issue, and is therefore speaking out publicly against Proposition 8.

This is just that, a civil rights issue, not just a political issue, and it is truly saddening that personal religious beliefs have been successful in pushing Prop 8 to the California Constitution. Hopefully, the California Supreme Court Justices, will uphold the civil rights it past earlier this year and squash this proposition once and for all.

Two possibilities exist as to avenues of killing this proposition. One argument could be made that Proposition 8 is more than a simple addendum to the California Constitution, but a full amendment, in which case, the proposition would need a majority two-thirds vote to pass. Pop 8 won by a margin of roughly 52% Yes, and 48% No – not a clear majority and not by any means a two-thirds majority.

The second possibility is that, upon hearing the case of opponents to Proposition 8, the Supreme Court justices find Prop 8 itself to be unconstitutional and find in favor of granting the civil rights of same-sex marriage couples.

Either possibility will gladly be taken, but the latter will be preferred. It will set precedent for future law in the State of California and abroad. It will put to rest any question the stance of the State of California on this matter and grant the civil rights that should be had of same-sex couples.

Photo Credit: ABC News and Boston

Written by hockeymandave

November 20, 2008 at 4:45 pm

Posted in Blogroll, Uncategorized

Tagged with , ,

Lieberman, Back in Action

leave a comment »

Democrat-turned-Independent Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT) mended some of the tides of separation with Democratic leaders today. By a vote of 42-13, Lieberman was allowed to keep his chairmen position on the Senate Homeland Security Committee by the Senate Democratic caucus.

It was not all that long ago that Lieberman enraged Democrats by speaking at the Republican National Convention, offering his public support for Senator John McCain (R-AZ). But in the new Obama-era of politics, the President-Elect offered a sense of forgiveness to the Senator. Whether or not you or I agree with, or like for that matter, Senator Lieberman, Obama is clearly trying to create a government that works together, mending ties with politicians of opposing political views, and even in the case of Lieberman, mending the ties with defectors.

This election year looks to be a cleaning house of the Senate and government. Reaching an overwhelming majority in the Senate, Democrats may be able to prevent a Republican filibuster for the next few years. A change of party has reached the Oval Office. Its cabinet is shaping up to be comprised of Clinton-era men and women with long, established, and qualified resumés. And in the end, hopefully this means a government that works together for the greater good, putting out the fires that Lieberman eludes to in the below interview with Katie Couric.

Written by hockeymandave

November 19, 2008 at 4:43 pm

The Pentagon Wants More Money

leave a comment »

In the midst of financial bailouts and failing economies, the Pentagon has revised its request for funding from the United States government. It is now asking for $524 billion in funding, a $9 billion increase in its baseline request for next fiscal year. This does not include added expenses for keeping troops overseas fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is likely to add a few more billion to the budget.

What does this mean for the nation? President Bush entered the Oval office back in 2000 with a relative surplus in the National economy. Fast forward nearly eight years later, and this country is trillions of dollars in debt. Most of that debt comes from costly wars and defense budgeting. These are the tax payers dollars and supplementals to Congress.

Should we be spending this much on defense? We are talking over a half trillion dollars for one year! Surely there must be some inefficiencies that could be eliminated to bring down this dollar amount. When President-Elect Barack Obama takes office January 20th, among the many other issues on his plate, he needs to take a serious look at government spending programs. He needs to evaluate their effectiveness and appropriateness, and make changes accordingly.

The United States Dollar can not be the open, readily-available resource that it has been to government spending programs the past eight years. Military officials expect the Pentagon budget requests to reach a plateau in the next couple of years as the wars are dialed down and research on new weapons technologies advances to the production stage.

Photo Credit: CNN

Written by hockeymandave

November 19, 2008 at 4:37 pm

At What Cost?

leave a comment »

As the “Big Three” teeter with collapse, three million workers around the nation face the looming possibility of job loss. They have not seen economic success in several years, and are treading dangerously close with having no financial capital with which to operate their respective companies.

Why? They have resisted change. Body designs, amenities, and features in automobiles certainly have changed in recent years. But the business practices have remained largely the same. Japanese and other foreign auto industries have successfully dealt with changing needs and consumer demands. The environment is becoming a growing concern. Oil is a unstable commodity that we are hoping to steer ourselves away from holistic dependance on.

It was not until the past few years that American automotive makers began to realize they needed to change. American’s were opting to buy foreign-made cars that were more fuel-efficient over the design and muscle of American vehicles. Jumping on the ship so late has cost General Motors (GM), Ford, and Chrysler billions in expenses, and put their corporations in danger of bankruptcy.

Questions have been brought up during Congressional hearings with American auto industry executives as to the necessity of such bailout measures. Would bailing out another industry in hard economic times prove fruitful? According to the auto industry, the alternative would be far more catastrophic. Not offering $25 billion in economic stimulus aid would result in a sure collapse of the industry. The loss of an industry that comprises approximately 4% of this country’s GDP would be catastrophic. The loss of jobs would be in the millions, the loss in American income in the billions. The economy – even worse off.

The problem is – we can not trust these companies based on their past business practices. Shelling out billions of dollars in economic aid is not the answer. The government should rather devise a package in which it offers these companies a chance to turn themselves around, and reward these companies for doing so, with government loans that are required to be paid back.

The government has bailed out an auto manufacturer before. In 1979, Chrysler received $1.2 billion in government loans as it faced bankruptcy. And less than four years later, Chrysler paid the government back every dollar, with interest. Chrysler used the bailout funds to restructure and get their act together. And in doing so, they were able to turn profits to such a degree that they were able to pay back the government all money owed.

We can not issue a blank check to the auto industry today. Giving them a $25 billion economic stimulus aid package will only go towards operating expenses and cover purchasing capital. It will not go towards restructuring or reworking their business models. The government has recognized this, and will not simply issue out a blank-check aid package. The best result out of this situation, for the American people, for the economy, and for the auto industry, is a rewards-based aid package which offers financial aid to the companies who have proven they can dig themselves out of their current sleuths of messes.

And to put things simply, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger called out the Detroit auto manufacturers at a luncheon speech, calling on Detroit to “get of [their] butts.”

Photo Credit: New York Times Archives and American Elephants

Written by hockeymandave

November 19, 2008 at 3:59 pm

Vocal Outrage Against Obama

leave a comment »

Al-Qaida’s Number 2 leader, Ayman al-Zawahri posted a message directed at President-Elect Barack Obama on Wednesday. Zawahri spent the majority of his 11 and a half minute audio clip speech demeaning the President-Elect, referring to Obama by racial epithets and degrading terms.

The video, which in part is embedded below, is being viewed as mere “despicable comments from a terrorist” by members of the State Department, that quotation from State Department spokesman Sean McCormack.

“America has put on a new face, but its heart full of hate, mind drowning in greed, and spirit which spreads evil, murder, repression and despotism continue to be the same as always,” the deputy of al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden said.

The video calls out Obama as a new face on an old body (a reference to the United States). He calls America a “mind drowning in greed, and [a] spirit which spreads evil, murder, repression, and despotism.” He sites the failures of Great Britain, China, and Russia in the past. Lets take a minute to think back to how Afghanistan had any chance of defeating the former Soviet Union? Oh yeah, it was because of a body called US, the United States. We gave your country weapons, we trained your people to fight the Russians. And you won. But you had no chance of defeating Russian forces had we not intervened. So how dare you turn the table and attack us. Ideals and beliefs aside, how dare you attack our President-Elect for his association with Americans, Jews, Christians, etc. He was born to a Muslim father, and is now a Christian. WHAT is the commotion about? What is it, you lost “a soldier?” While religion is killing the Republican party, religion is tearing our world apart as it intertwines itself with world politics and terrorist activities.

I can not speak for every Muslim, but I have had many discussions with friends of Muslim faith. And they all agree that YOU are not a Muslim as THEY are a Muslim. You preach violence, war, and radicalism. Obama preaches change. Change from the Bush administrations policing efforts around the world. Obama wants to end the War in Iraq. And he wants to finish off the War in Afghanistan, but in order to do that, we have to focus our efforts on our nation’s security and ridding the world of deposed and radical leaders like yourself, leaders who only seek violence and bloodshed as a means to spreading your ideas and attaining your goals. Why don’t you concern yourself with the economic hardships the people of your country are facing, the widespread famine, harsh living conditions, and political instability?

This video is al-Qaida’s first public position on President-Elect Obama. What will result from this? So far, the Obama team has remained mum on the subject. Will Obama’s Presidency be marked by this video, a video transmitted before his Presidency even began? Or better yet, does this video even deserve a response? I am inclined to think not. Guess what al-Zawahri, you just showed your cards, and you are scared of an Obama Presidency. Thanks for letting us know.

Photo Credit: Huffington Post

Written by hockeymandave

November 19, 2008 at 3:53 pm